May 1999 - Ref 519
The problem of low housing demand in inner city areas
In some inner city areas there is virtually no demand for
housing. Anne Power and Katharine Mumford of the LSE, in a detailed study of such
neighbourhoods, found that the reasons were more to do with severe poverty and joblessness
within the neighbourhoods than the quality of the housing. Intensive inputs on many fronts
are helping to hold the conditions. Their study found:
- Good quality, modernised homes are being abandoned in some
inner city neighbourhoods. House prices have fallen, in some cases to zero, and some
blocks and streets are being demolished, including new housing. Demolition of empty
properties has not generally stemmed the tide of abandonment. Whole areas have virtually
no demand for housing.

- Britain's major cities have been losing population since the
turn of the century. Manchester and Newcastle, the two cities studied, have lost a fifth
of their population since 1961. Depopulation has paralleled severe job losses, mainly in
manufacturing. Job losses have hit low-skilled men particularly harshly. Long-term
unemployment in inner cities is chronic.

- Council housing dominates in the low demand areas studied,
but all tenures are affected. Very few tenants have become owners under the Right-to-Buy.
Low-cost owner-occupation outside the city is often a more attractive and cheaper option
for those in work.

- Low demand has generated falling school rolls, loss of
confidence in the area, a vacuum in social control, anti-social behaviour and intense fear
of crime.

- Many regeneration initiatives have been tried - intensive
management, proactive policing, resident involvement. These help hold conditions.
Resilience and vitality co-exist with acute decline.

- A fightback has developed involving local leaders,
innovative pro-city strategies, and new urban initiatives. Obsolete old buildings are
being converted into attractive apartments and new high density developments are in
demand, attracting working people back into cities.

Background
This study aims to: uncover and explain those events that are combining to cause the
abandonment of urban neighbourhoods; describe the struggle of those living through the
experience; uncover and assess attempted remedies and their impact on conditions and
trends.
The problems are at three levels:
- acute problems at city level;
- extreme problems at neighbourhood level;
- complete abandonment in the very worst pockets of the most
difficult areas.
City problems
The main focus is on Newcastle and Manchester, two cities experiencing long-run decline.
Like other large cities, they are adversely hit both by the loss of key industries and by
more general counter-urban trends. The North is suffering most from the problems of
abandonment and low demand. Across the country there is also changing demand for social
housing, leading to higher turnover and more difficult-to-let property. The result is
intense problems in cities and poor neighbourhoods.
Between 1971 and 1996, Manchester lost 22 per cent and
Newcastle 16 per cent of its population:
- Inner areas lost more people than outer areas;
- Unpopular neighbourhoods lost more than the city as a whole;
- There were serious job losses in the inner cities;
- Male jobs did much worse than female;
- The loss of manufacturing jobs was far above average.
The exodus slowed in the 1990s and may reverse. But the
rapid losses continued in the extreme areas.
The cities experience concentrated multiple deprivation,
which is far more intense in the inner neighbourhoods. Concentrated poverty is, according
to reports from both cities, the single biggest explanatory factor in neighbourhood
decline. All the neighbourhoods are part of much larger areas of severe deprivation. Lack
of work is a major factor. Double the proportion of the working age population is not
working, studying or training compared with the national average (Table
1).

Since the mid-1980s waiting-lists for council housing have
fallen dramatically in both cities and continue to fall. There is virtually no waiting
time for housing in the poorest neighbourhoods. Both cities have now opened their
allocations and are advertising nationally.
Extreme neighbourhoods
Four neighbourhoods were studied in detail. One in each city shows acute symptoms of
abandonment:
- Streets with a majority of houses empty;
- Demolition sites scattered throughout the area;
- Empty property across the neighbourhood;
- Falling property values;
- Intense demand problems in all property types, all tenures
and all parts of the neighbourhood. This means too few people wanting to live in those
properties.
In the other two neighbourhoods, conditions have not
plummeted to such a low point and there is more ground for hope that the situation can be
stabilised or reversed.
The neighbourhoods share many characteristics with
unpopular and difficult-to-manage urban areas all over the country, including high demand
cities like London. There is an intense hierarchy of popular and unpopular areas. The
least popular suffer high levels of empty property, high turnover, some abandonment and
demolition due to low demand. But there is a broad distinction between low demand in economically prosperous cities and regions such as the South East and low demand
in cities and regions suffering long-term structural decline such as the North.
In most cities, including Manchester and Newcastle, there
is nearly double the national proportion of council and housing association stock and much
lower levels of owner-occupation. This skewed ownership pattern is far more extreme in the
deprived neighbourhoods. Right-to-Buy sales are extremely low. This underlines the poverty
of the people and the low value attached to the areas.
The turnover of population is extremely high in council
housing, particularly in the neighbourhoods studied. But turnover affects all tenures. If
turnover moves above a certain level, it can become unmanageable. The turnover rate in
council housing was between 20 and 50 per cent. Figure 1
shows the vicious circle that this creates.

Housing associations have some very attractive,
small-scale, high quality developments tucked into the four areas which are experiencing
low demand; they are 'poaching' tenants from older but often renovated council housing or
simply finding properties unlettable. Some residents actively campaigned against housing
association development whilst, in other parts, residents supported or even initiated
development. But housing associations are now demolishing unlettable, unsellable property.
Incipient abandonment: the worst pockets
Both cities reported a swift, sudden and unexpected loss of demand in the last few years.
One in six properties are empty in the neighbourhoods, many more in some pockets.
- The boarded-up properties can belong to the local authority,
a local housing association, a private landlord, an owner-occupier - abandonment is
affecting all tenures;
- The semi-abandoned streets or blocks include Victorian
terraces, 1930s council cottages, post-war houses, modern housing association developments
less than 10 years old, small blocks of sheltered flats, 1960s and '70s purpose-built
estates - all property types are involved;
- The streets with boarded-up properties are not on the whole
badly maintained, or unappealing. They often contain attractive, small-scale, well-built
houses with gardens. Transferred to an inner London context many of the properties would
be 'gentrified';
- Some Victorian terraces are solid, attractive and renovated,
but the backs are a jumble of out-houses, high walls and rubbish-strewn alleys - ugly,
insecure and long out-dated. No way has been found of turning these yards and alleys into
secure, joined-up gardens;
- Many individual houses are still attractive but the
disorderly neighbourhood environment is an active deterrent;
- There are frequent discussions in the city councils about
demolition - the destabilising effect on the community is intense.
Both cities are regularly demolishing abandoned property.
Demolition of specific unpopular blocks and blighted property has sometimes increased the
popularity of surrounding houses. But in some instances, demolition has fuelled the
problem by signalling a general lack of confidence. An atmosphere of uncertainty about the
future of the area gives signals of zero value and zero demand, thereby deterring would-be
applicants. Many demolition decisions are being made in response to immediate
neighbourhood conditions without a clear overall plan or strategy or a full appraisal of
the options. Other nearby streets then often start to show the same symptoms. Currently
some demolition proposals are provoking objections even where levels of abandonment are
high. Remaining residents often want to hold on.
The speed with which streets or blocks are shifting from
being relatively well-occupied to nearly half empty is alarming. This creates instability
and a reduction in informal social controls, leaving a vacuum which eventually tips a
highly localised low demand area into rapid abandonment.
The challenge
In sum, there has been a collapse in housing demand within the neighbourhoods:
- Social landlords are operating in direct competition with
each other;
- Landlords use the '100 per cent benefit system' to
facilitate the movement of a diminishing number of tenants around surplus stock;
- Private landlords are often willing to rehouse evicted
tenants as long as the rent is guaranteed;
- Private landlords speculate around demolition decisions,
buying up property for little in the hope of high rent from temporary lettings, before
Compulsory Purchase Orders;
- Local authorities and police are struggling to enforce basic
standards and reduce crime.
Crime, particularly violent crime, is a serious problem.
But proactive policing has made significant in-roads through co-ordinated action with
residents.
Most schools in these neighbourhoods have falling rolls,
surplus places and high pupil turnover. Free school meals - a clear measure of family
poverty - are sometimes four times the national rate. In spite of this, schools
occasionally excel - achieving standards just above the national average.
Low demand has many negative impacts on those living and
working in the areas, but a fightback often develops including the following features:
- The emergence of local leaders;
- Service innovation and improved co-ordination;
- Experimental working between police, housing and residents;
- Attempts at marketing the housing and area;
- Improved security, for example the use of concierges,
wardens;
- The development of longer-term strategies.
Inner neighbourhoods offer many positive assets which
encourage more stable residents to stay and may lead to a renaissance:
- Good quality housing;
- Proximity to city centre and good transport links;
- Locally based services;
- Regeneration programmes;
- Gradual break-up of large council estates and transfer to
new social landlords;
- New proposals for neighbourhood management;
- People-based approaches;
- Some private investment and city centre renewal.
Cities are under great pressure but there is real potential
for repopulating inner areas:
- Positive measures are already in train;
- Universal forms of support - such as education, police and
health services - underpin social cohesion;
- Marketing social housing to a wide band of the population
raises its value and increases demand in some circumstances;
- Regeneration projects are attracting 'urban pioneers' back
into centre cities. They may gradually spread into the increasingly empty inner
neighbourhoods;
- Existing residents can be encouraged to stay and rebuild
conditions providing an anchor for city rebirth;
- Higher population densities support more services and create
the street life that makes urban neighbourhoods attractive. Many more smaller households
can increase the density of city populations;
- Pro-active policing helps restore confidence, contain
violence and reduce fear. Policing requires many channels of communication, local support,
clear ground rules and strong community links.
Policy implications
In the end, urban neighbourhoods need an over-arching structure for managing conditions
and orchestrating the constant changes:
- Low-skilled residents need intensive support and strong
links to employers to help them move into new jobs;
- Incentives for brownfield development and recycling
buildings need to be stronger than the lure of greenfield sites;
- A pro-city stance depends on meticulous environmental care
and maintenance, cheap, easy public transport, better city schools, more secure
neighbourhoods.
The researchers conclude that it is not inevitable that
inner city areas will continue to lose people, lose control, and lose viability. It is
possible to make cities work. The future of our environment, our communities and our
crowded country depends on saving what is a huge, wasting asset. The neighbourhoods where
the study found such acute decline may become the urban centres of tomorrow.
About the study
The four inner city neighbourhoods studied in detail contained approximately 16,000
households in total. The study involved interviews with 104 staff working in the main
local services, and 24 residents representatives in the two cities. A further 33 people
from local authorities and housing associations across the country were interviewed. In
addition, the study included direct observation, an analysis of press reports, local
newsletters, photographs, street counts of empty property, and collection of available
facts on the areas and the cities from a wide range of sources including the census,
council reports and monitoring, government records, other research and national
information.
How to get
further information
The full report, The slow death of great cities? Urban abandonment or urban
renaissance by Anne Power and Katharine Mumford, is published for the Foundation by
YPS (ISBN 1 902633 11 3, price £16.95 plus £2 p&p)Click
on the 'order report' icon in the left margin to order online.
|