|
Implementing direct payments in mental health
Direct payments
increase the choice and control that people have over the support
they receive. The take-up of direct payments by people experiencing
mental health problems has been extremely low in most parts of the
country. This project, New Directions, was undertaken by the Health
and Social Care Advisory Service and draws on a range of discussions
with over 250 service users and staff in order to identify what
needs to happen for direct payments to be successfully implemented:
- Service users, carers and professionals require
straightforward, accurate and accessible information about
direct payments which is specific to mental health.

- Both service users and professionals can be confused about
the distinction to access to an assessment for receipt of direct
payments and access to services, where the threshold may be much
higher and based largely on clinical considerations. This can
affect take-up.

- Mental health users require specific advocacy and practical
support to facilitate access to and use of direct payments.

- The absence of a streamlined process integrated with the
Care Programme Approach adds to the sense of direct payments
being a burden rather than an opportunity.

- Ways to increase take-up by people from black and minority
ethnic communities include developing resources and approaches,
including outreach and direct support services specific to those
communities.

- A change in the culture of mental health service provision
is required. This would need a tangible commitment to promoting
self-determination, evident in the way staff interact and
support people experiencing mental distress.

- Introducing direct payments requires effective leadership to
drive the process of implementation from national direction and
guidance through to local leadership, at both a strategic and
operational level.

- Fostering partnerships across organisations and supporting
collaborative problem solving could facilitate learning about
the implementation of direct payments.

- Introducing direct payments in a planned way requires
thought as to how existing services can be reviewed,
reconfigured and recommissioned.

- There is a need to review what direct payments cover in
mental health: the distinction between health and social care in
mental health is not an easy one, and arguably no longer
relevant given the integration of health and social care to
provide mental health services.

Background
Local authorities now have a duty to offer direct payments to people who are
eligible and to make payments to those who want them. Direct payments offer
greater independence and flexibility in support arrangements and, for people
from black and minority ethnic communities, this can mean improved access to
culturally sensitive support. For people experiencing mental health problems
direct payments can facilitate social inclusion, through providing support to
access mainstream activities that are not stigmatising or mental health
focused.
However, since the introduction of direct payments in 1997 their take-up by
people experiencing mental health problems has been slow. At the end of
September 2003, only five local authorities had ten or more mental health
service users on direct payments and nearly two-thirds had no mental health
service users using direct payments. The main aim of this project (‘New
Directions’) was to engage with mental health service users, mental
health professionals and managers in debate around common concerns in order to
identify what needs to happen for direct payments to be successfully
implemented. It built on an earlier study published in 2004 by HASCAS which had
evaluated the introduction of direct payments in mental health in five national
pilot sites.
“It’s all too difficult and complicated”
Service users and staff working in mental health services shared a lack of
awareness and confusion about direct payments for people experiencing mental
health problems, creating a sense that “it’s all too difficult and
complicated”. They highlighted a number of issues.
For service users there was confusion with another government initiative to
pay benefits directly into people’s bank accounts. Where people had heard
of direct payments as a means of accessing social care there were concerns
about the practicalities, particularly in relation to recruiting and employing
staff, money management and excessive paperwork.
For staff working in mental health services there was a sense of being
overwhelmed by government initiatives in mental health, a consequent lack of
clarity as to where direct payments fitted and therefore what their role should
be. As with service users, the absence of a streamlined process integrated with
the Care Programme Approach added to the sense of direct payments being a
burden rather than an opportunity.
There was also confusion about eligibility with an assumption being wrongly
made that direct payments are only for physically disabled people or should
only be offered to people whom care co-ordinators view as capable of managing
the payment. There was also an underlying anxiety about the impact of direct
payments on people’s jobs; this suggested the absence of a strategic and
managed approach in introducing direct payments.
Information and support
The discussions highlight an urgent need to ensure
access to straightforward accurate information which is specific to mental
health and uses real life examples to demonstrate how direct payments can be
accessed and used. Targeting specific groups and taking information to them was
identified as essential; for example, targeting people before they leave
hospital, outreach work with black and minority ethnic communities, as well as
ensuring that the options are discussed with all potential recipients.
Undertaking this work adequately would require resources and training being
made available but is vital if take up for these communities is to be increased.
In addition, the existence of independent advocacy and support schemes -
which can provide information, speak up on someone’s behalf and provide
help with the practicalities - was identified as necessary for building
confidence in accessing and using direct payments. There are many examples of
where this is working well, for example the Independent Living Association in
Essex. The voluntary sector was thought to have a central role in this respect,
particularly for black and minority ethnic communities, with the Mellow
Campaign and Equalities providing good examples of how this is working in practice.
Staffing issues
Staff need to be clear what their role is in relation
to direct payments and this needs to take account of the integration of health
and social care to provide mental health services. There needs to be an
investment in practice development which includes training and supervision with
worked examples of direct payments and mental health. This should include
sessions delivered by direct payment recipients, so staff can understand the
impact of direct payments on peoples’ lives and how they can improve the
available choices. This clarity of role would be further supported by processes
which are effective and easy to use and are integrated with the requirements of
the Care Programme Approach.
A different way of thinking
The policy on direct payments is different: unlike most other policies it
has been driven by disabled people with a view to gaining greater independence
and choice. This was made clear at the national conference:
“Direct payments have been framed in terms of
support (not illness or incapacity); in terms of ensuring that people can have
the kind and amount of support they need to live their lives as fully, as
freely, and with as many choices and opportunities as they can. They can have
more choice; they can have more control; because they can with help and
independent guidance get the kind of support and assistance they need to live
their lives.” (Professor Peter Beresford, Centre for Citizen
Participation, Brunel University)
Many service users expressed a lack of confidence in
services to understand this and therefore to implement direct payments
successfully; for those from black and minority ethnic communities this was
compounded by their experiences of institutional racism. Managers and staff
alike identified both a focus on illness and diagnosis and the current emphasis
on risk as restricting the vision and therefore opportunities for greater
independence for people. Widespread implementation relies on an understanding
of a ‘social model’ of mental ill-health which emphasises capacity
and recovery. This has implications for organisations, their value base, how
this is translated into action in the ways in which services are provided and
their commitment to work with other organisations towards the goal of
inclusion.
Implementing direct payments in mental health
The discussions suggest that successful implementation requires action on a
number of different fronts by different players. It relies on proactive
managers who are clear about what needs to be done, knowledgeable and committed
practitioners and informed service users who are interested in exploring the
options of direct payments and have access to an independent and appropriately
funded direct payment support scheme. This needs to be fostered by a clear
organisational direction and support for promoting an approach which increases
people’s self–determination and by national guidance on
implementing direct payments in mental health.
The importance of leadership at all levels was highlighted:
“It is the job of the manager to be the
‘plunger’ to unblock the blocks to change. Managers at all levels
have to articulate the vision and the process.” (Leroy Lewis, South Essex
NHS Partnership)
Team leaders were identified as central with the
following suggestions for the action they should take: providing access to
training and practice development, building a positive working relationship
between the team and direct payment support schemes, and reflecting with the
team on progress in relation to implementing direct payments. Supportive and
enthusiastic senior managers were also identified as a key ingredient with the
central role to play in ensuring a strategic approach and managing the changes
in practice and service delivery which the introduction of direct payments, and
the move to individualised commissioning, implies. The importance of director
level support in demonstrating commitment to independent living, in general,
and to direct payments, in particular, was also stressed.
The importance of a systematic approach
The need to adopt a strategic approach, managing the introduction of direct
payments and supporting staff, users and carers through the process of change
was a pervasive theme. The introduction of direct payments in mental health
seem to be unplanned, ad hoc and opportunistic resulting in inequities in
access. Enthusiastic care co-ordinators securing direct payments for
individuals can give others the confidence to pursue direct payments for their
clients and stimulate action form their managers. On its own, however, this is
unlikely to be enough and attention need to be paid to the broader implications
of introducing direct payments.
Other implications were also highlighted:
- Changes in practice will have to be underpinned
in changes in service commissioning, for example moving away from block
contracts to release money for direct payments. This has far-reaching
implications which will need to be explored at both a local and national
level;
- Making the whole system work and fit together
needs attention, including the establishment of structures and processes which
facilitate this. The development of a multi-agency Steering Group to spearhead
the introduction of direct payments has been shown to have enormous value from
previous work. This would need to link formally with existing multi-agency
strategic groups which are responsible for reviewing and reshaping of mental
health services, for example Local Implementation Teams or Partnership
Boards.
Implications for policy
Whilst local authorities now have targets to meet to increase the number of
people receiving direct payments, these on their own are unlikely to increase
the take-up by people experiencing mental health problems. This study suggests
that, in addition to a strategic approach at a local level, the definition of
what direct payments can be used for in mental health needs reviewing in the
light of the integration of health and social care in the provision of mental
health services. Guidance is also needed on reviewing and decommissioning
services as the introduction of direct payments provides an opportunity to
reshape existing services, particularly day services.
About the project
This project was carried out by a team from the Health and Social Care
Advisory Service. Four focus groups (120 participants) were held in Birmingham,
Manchester, London and Maidstone (Kent). Their prime aim was to promote a
dialogue with mental health professionals and service users about the potential
of direct payments to offer choice and control to service users. Each focus
group targeted a different group: service users (particularly those from black
and minority ethnic communities); voluntary groups, self-help and advocacy
groups; practitioners, particularly care co-ordinators and front-line workers;
and senior managers.
Service users facilitated the focus groups with other service users,
professionals and staff from direct payment support services sharing their
experience and learning about direct payments during the focus groups. A
national implementation event was held in May 2004 bringing together 150
participants to reflect on the key themes which had emerged from the focus
groups and identify how the barriers to implementation could be addressed.
Further information was obtained from structured telephone interviews with lead
managers for direct payments from five local authorities, who have made
progress in introducing direct payments for people with mental health problems
(Essex, Leeds, Liverpool, Norfolk and West Sussex).
For further information
Additional information on HASCAS work on direct payments and mental health
is available from: Health and Social Care Advisory Service, King’s Fund, 11-13 Cavendish Square,
London, Tel: 0207 307 2892,
email:
k.newbigging@hascas.org.uk.
The report on the national evaluation,
Implementing direct payments in
mental health: An evaluation (2004) by H Spandler and N Vick, is available from
Centrevents on 01273 441676, or
geoff@centrevents.co.uk.
The full report, Direct payments and mental health: New directions by Karen Newbigging and Janice Lowe, is published for the Foundation by Pavilion
Publishing (ISBN 1 84196 138 8, price £15.95).
Click on the 'order report' icon in
the left margin to order online.
Click on the 'report .pdf' icon in the
left margin to download a pdf of the full report free of charge. (File
size is 0.25MB). |