September 2004 - Ref 954
The outcomes and costs of Home-Start support for young families
under stress
Supporting parents
is central to the current government's approach to improving
children's lives. However, little is as yet known about the
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of family support services.
Home-Start is currently one of the largest family support
organisations in the UK. Established over thirty years ago, it
offers volunteer home visiting support to families with children
under five years of age. This study, by Colette McAuley, Martin
Knapp, Jennifer Beecham, Nyree McCurry and Michelle Sleed, evaluates
the outcomes and costs of Home-Start support to 80 young families
under stress compared with 82 similar families who did not receive
this kind of support. The study found that:
- At the start of the study, the
majority of mothers from both groups were experiencing a high level
of parenting stress at the outset and high levels of depressive
symptoms. Problems with the social and emotional development of
their children were also evident.

- The mothers appeared to have little
social support, and for the families using Home-Start, this was
often the only non-statutory service available.

- Mothers who received the support of a
Home-Start volunteer valued the service and considered that it had
made a positive difference to their lives.

- At the eleven-month follow-up, the
mothers in both groups had improved in well-being. This appeared to
be due to changes over time and to experience.
- The results did not support the view
that Home-Start had made a significant difference to the mothers
over the eleven-month period of the research, relative to the
experiences of the families in the comparison group. Interviews with
the mothers suggested that the intensity and type of support may
have contributed to this.

- Although many families were not
accessing the services they clearly needed, the costs of supporting
young families experiencing stress are still quite high, with the
costs spread across a number of agencies.

- The receipt of Home-Start services
nevertheless pushed costs for the study group to a higher level
relative to the comparison group. Combined with the outcome results,
the evidence did not therefore point to a cost-effectiveness
advantage for Home-Start.

Background
The recent Green Paper Every Child Matters (Stationery Office, 2003)
indicates the Government's intention to place support for parents
and carers at the centre of its approach to improving children's
lives. This builds upon the stronger mandate given to family support
in recent child care legislation in England and Wales and Northern
Ireland. It has been recognised for some time, though, that family
support services should be offered where needs have been assessed,
and where there is a likelihood of beneficial outcomes for children
and families. More recently, there is an expectation that such
services should also be seen to be cost-effective.
Home-Start is one of the largest
family support providers in the United Kingdom. Established over
thirty years ago, there are now 330 Home-Start schemes in England,
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (Home-Start, 2003). It offers
volunteer home visiting support to families under stress where there
is at least one child under five years of age. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the outcomes and costs of Home-Start support to
young families in the community who were experiencing stress.
For this study of effectiveness, the
researchers recruited and followed the progress of 162 families from
Northern Ireland and South England over an eleven month period. The
study group (80) of young families received Home-Start support
whilst the comparison group (82) did not. The families in both
groups were well matched (see 'About the project' for details).
Needs of the families at outset
The research found that the needs of the majority of mothers in both
groups were high. The mothers were experiencing a high level of
parenting stress and were exhibiting a high level of depressive
symptoms. Problems with the emotional and social development of
their children were also evident.
The initial interviews with the
mothers confirmed that the stresses they were facing were multiple
and interconnected and affected their capacity to parent. Many of
the mothers had experienced considerable trauma related to pregnancy
and birth and the transition to parenthood generally had not been a
smooth one. The prevalence of depressive symptoms amongst the
mothers was high, with many indicating that they had moderate to
severe symptoms.
"All I do is cry. I'm short-tempered
with the kids, I wouldn't harm them but I snap at them. And ... I also
snap at my husband as well."
Almost three-quarters of the mothers
had concerns about the health or development of their children.
Needs ranged broadly from childhood asthma and behaviour problems to
autism.
"He's been having a lot of tantrums ...
he's been biting and he's been violent to me and his sister ... It
makes it very stressful when we go out because he has tantrums and
is badly behaved."
Whilst most of the mothers were not
lone parents, their husbands/partners were at work and the daily
responsibility for caring for the children appeared to fall upon the
mothers. There was a strong sense of these mothers being overwhelmed
at times by the intensity of the demands being placed upon them,
particularly when trying to care for several children on their own.
What seemed to make the situation particularly stressful was the
lack of respite.
"You don't have much time for
yourself ... so after a while you just feel that you're not coping ...
that just gradually gets you down."
"I haven't really got anyone down
here that I can speak to. I love my kids to bits and I wouldn't be
without them, but I need a break at the same time ... I just feel so
alone."
Another major source of stress for
these mothers was finance. Many were finding it difficult to decide
whether to return to work and were highly critical of the lack of
affordable childcare facilities to make this feasible. Many mothers
were worried about their family's financial situation and several
were in debt.
Families' use of services
Overall, these mothers had little available informal support. There
were a variety of reasons for this. Some mothers lived some distance
away from family, and the families of some others could not offer
support owing to their own circumstances. Occasionally the
relationships with family were fractured. There was little evidence
of shared responsibility for parenting with estranged spouses.
The families used a range of services. Contact with mental health
services, A&E and GPs was quite high relative to typical levels for
the population. Again, there were very few differences between the
groups in the services being received prior to the start of the
research.
Home-Start support
Home-Start offered volunteer home visiting support to the study
families, on average for 21/2 hours per week. The volunteers
generally offered a combination of emotional support, practical
assistance and help with outings. They tended to provide more
emotional support at the beginning and more help with outings in the
latter months. Practical assistance remained fairly constant
throughout. The average length of support was nine months, although
the number of visits per month diminished over time.
Outcomes and costs of Home-Start
support at follow-up
Approximately eleven months after they were first interviewed, the
majority of the mothers in both the study and comparison groups had
much improved situations. They were experiencing less parenting
stress and exhibiting fewer depressive symptoms. They had higher
self-esteem and there was evidence of improvement in the emotional
and social development of their children. They also had more social
support. The progress was evident not only from the improvement on
all the outcome measures but also from the content of the interviews
with the mothers. However, mothers in both groups showed similar
levels of improvement, even though there was no evidence of any
other comparable family support service being received by the
comparison group during the intervening period.
The follow-up interviews with the
mothers suggested that these improvements were due to a number of
factors. Many of the issues relating to the transition to parenthood
were resolved through time and experience. Many of the short-term
health problems of the mothers and babies were no longer present.
There was evidence of the mothers gaining in confidence as parents.
They had established routines to manage competing demands and had
made decisions about their priorities. In many ways, they seemed to
have regained control over their lives. Some had returned to work
which resulted in regaining their work status, an improved financial
situation and more equitable sharing of parental responsibilities.
An important change for many mothers was that their children were
older, more independent and often attending playgroups or schools,
giving the mothers some respite from the daily demands of family
life. Furthermore, those who had been experiencing fraught
relationships with ex-husbands/partners stated that the issues were
largely resolved following court decisions about contact and
financial support.
Four-fifths of the mothers using
Home-Start stated that it had made a difference to the stresses they
had been experiencing. The service helped to provide a sense of
relief from overwhelming pressure and most mothers clearly valued
the support and friendship offered by the volunteers. However, many
mothers felt that the intensity of the service was insufficient to
make a significant difference to the stresses they were
experiencing.
"I think I got more than I expected
out of it because I have been pleasantly surprised at the family
outings ... I've enjoyed that."
"I think practically it is a great
idea. The two hours were great but to make a difference, it needs to
be a bit more intense."
Many of the families were using quite
a number of health, education and other services before the research
started. Most of these service contacts continued during the
research period. Overall, the receipt of Home-Start did not alter
the costs of formal service use. At follow-up, there were no
significant differences in formal service costs between the study
and comparison groups. However, the total costs for the study group
were higher due to the additional costs of the Home-Start support
(see Figure 1).

Research issues
Our understanding about support services for children and families
and how best to evaluate their effectiveness is clearly at an early
stage in the UK. There is also very little empirical work in the UK
on the cost-effectiveness of interventions, and the calculation of
service costs is still at a rudimentary stage.
This study has provided an evaluation
of the effectiveness of Home-Start support eleven months after the
service was initially offered. This provides a solid starting point
to consider its impact over time. However, the evaluation of most
early years' services usually involves examination of impact over
longer periods. With a community-based initiative such as
Home-Start, which does not aim to provide a structured, intensive
programme, a follow-up study after a number of years might well
prove valuable.
About the project
The study followed 162 families with young children over an
eleven-month period. Eighty of these families received Home-Start
volunteer home visiting support during that period whilst the
remainder did not. All of the mothers were interviewed at baseline
and follow-up and they completed standardised measures on parenting
stress, mental health, self-esteem, social support and the emotional
and social development of their children at both time points. They
also completed a questionnaire on service use and their economic
circumstances at outset and follow-up.
The families were well matched on
demographic variables and on maternal needs at outset. Other
services being used prior to the start of the research were also
similar for both groups.
How to get further
information
The full report, Young families under
stress: Outcomes and costs of Home-Start support by Colette
McAuley, Martin Knapp, Jennifer Beecham, Nyree McCurry and Michelle
Sleed, is published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (ISBN 1 85935
217 0, price £14.95).
Click on the 'order report' icon in
the left margin to order online.
Click on the 'report .pdf' icon in the
left margin to download a pdf of the full report free of charge. (File
size is 0.43MB). |