Mentoring by volunteers or professional support workers can be a positive experience for vulnerable young people, but should not be viewed as the single solution to all their problems, according to a new study by researchers at Aberdeen University for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
The research follows a recent commitment by the Scottish Executive to the development of youth mentoring programmes, reflecting an increasingly important role for mentoring within UK youth policy.
The researchers interviewed young people and their mentors in three contrasting schemes: a project for young homeless people and an education project for young people excluded from school, both in Moray, and a befriending scheme in Dundee. The befriending scheme used volunteers, who were matched, one-to-one, with a young person, whilst the other schemes used paid keyworkers who worked on both an individual and a group basis.
The study showed that:
Mentors found the mentoring process to be an opportunity to work with rather than on young people, and a way of developing a young person’s untapped potential. But they pointed to the negative effects that peer groups could have on their charges and often had to develop strategies to deal with this issue.
Kate Philip, a senior research fellow at Aberdeen University and co-author of the report, said: “Our findings show that mentoring experiences can be very powerful for young people. But planned mentoring is often a risky business fraught with challenges. Many young people described mentoring as a form of friendship and as ‘different’. Trying to ‘prescribe’ mentoring by making it fit into pre-defined timescales and frameworks may be counter-productive. Planned mentoring that allows for real choice and negotiation may have more value in the long term.”