The ability of trade unions to secure better pay for their members, compared with non-union members, appears to be in long-term decline. Although underlying pay levels in some circumstances remain significantly higher, evidence from the late 1990s suggests no discernible difference between union and non-union pay increases.
New research for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation contrasts the recent record on pay with the early 1980s when unions were more widespread and powerful. But it also finds that the tendency of 20 years ago for union representation to inhibit job growth still remains.
Employment in unionised workplaces in the private sector declined at an average rate of 1.8 per cent a year in the 1990s, compared with employment growth of 1.4 per cent in the non-union workplaces. An important exception was plants where unions were able to negotiate on employment as well as pay – these enjoyed similar growth to non-union plants.
Researchers at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) and the Policy Studies Institute assessed the unions’ role in pay and employment using data from a 1998 nationally-representative survey of managers and staff in nearly 2,200 workplaces with more than ten employees. They found that:
Neil Millward, Senior Research Fellow at NIESR and co-author of the report, said: "The evidence on annual pay settlements and on underlying pay levels suggests that the ability of unions to enhance wages and salaries is in long-term decline. However, it does also seem that the negative effects of unions on job losses are generally avoidable where management allow them a role in determining employment matters as well as pay."
He added: "Our findings have important implications for the new legislation enabling unions to force recognition from reluctant employers when a majority of the workforce want to be represented. On the one hand, it seems that employers have little justification for opposing unionisation on the grounds that it might lead to unacceptable wage costs. On the other, unions will find it harder to appeal for new members on the basis that they generally achieve higher pay."