An analysis of how local authorities in England and Wales are implementing private sector housing renewal strategies.
The government has recently overhauled its approach towards encouraging home-owners and landlords to maintain and improve their properties. Eighty per cent of homes in England and Wales are now privately owned.
After outlining the government’s agenda, the authors evaluate a number of key aspects of the policy:
The report finds a contrast between the optimistic and ambitious expectations of the government’s new measures, and the serious lack of capacity and resources within local authorities to deliver effective local private sector housing renewal strategies.
The Regulatory Reform (England and Wales) (Housing Assistance) Order 2002 (the RRO) has radically changed the way in which government seeks to encourage private sector home improvement in England and Wales. The RRO swept away much of the prescriptive nature of previous legislation, instituting a general power on local authorities to provide “assistance” “in any form” “to any person”, to improve, repair, adapt or rebuild residential premises. This study, by Rick Groves and Sian Sankey at the University of Birmingham, was commissioned jointly by the JRF, ODPM and the Welsh Assembly Government. The work examined the experiences of local authorities seeking to implement these new powers. Key messages to emerge are that:
The RRO (which became operational on 18 July 2003) and related reforms (including provisions in the Housing Act 2004) introduced a radical new approach to private sector housing renewal. These reforms promoted:
More recent reforms incorporated in the Housing Act 2004 have included: a new method of evaluating the condition of the housing stock (the Housing, Health and Safety Rating System) and a system of mandatory and discretionary licensing for houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) in the private rented sector.
This is a formidable new agenda for local housing authorities. This study examines how local authorities are implementing these new powers.
Although most local authorities welcomed the overall change in national policy they were for the most part cautious in introducing change to their own practices. The most obvious initial changes were in the introduction of a range of grants, which gave more flexibility to their local policies. The introduction of loan finance has been problematic, with many authorities unable to reach agreement over the availability of loan finance with local lenders. As a result, just under 30 per cent of authorities had decided to provide loan finance of their own and a further 22 per cent of authorities were collaborating with ‘not for profit’ intermediary lenders. Progress in drawing in private finance had, as a consequence, proved particularly slow.
The major thrust in private sector housing renewal was in the area of energy-efficiency, where measures pre-dated the RRO. Almost all authorities were engaged in partnerships with the aim of improving domestic energy-efficiency. This area of policy benefited greatly from the Warm Front grants regime managed by Defra.
In other areas of policy, such as the private rented sector and in developing more proactive ‘preventive’ approaches (such as guidance, handyperson services and DIY training) to private sector renewal, developments were disappointing. At the time of the study’s survey, 30 per cent of vulnerable households in ‘non-decent’ homes were living in privately rented accommodation. However, very few local authorities were adopting innovative approaches to engaging more effectively with private landlords in order to improve management and maintenance standards in the sector. One reason for this may have been the imminent changes affecting the sector in the Housing Act 2004. Local authorities may well have been holding back with their policy changes in anticipation of the major changes which are yet to come into effect.
The Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder programme areas apart, there was evidence from the surveys that area-based approaches were giving way to more client-based programmes, with programmes targeted on particular types of household or developments. Examples here include targeting older people with energy efficiency or health measures. This was partly a response to the Government’s guidance for local authorities to concentrate their attention on vulnerable households living in ‘non-decent’ homes. There was also evidence of some innovative practice in clearance programmes, however. Examples include Newcastle’s Homeswap; partnership working with Registered Social Landlords in Manchester; and the appointment of property advisers (Rochdale) or Homemover officers (the Wirral), in order to “work with residents to assist in finding solutions to allow people to move more quickly”.
The major finding of the research was that, despite the fact that over 80 per cent of the housing stock in England is now in private ownership, more than half of the housing authorities in England employed no more than five full-time staff on private sector housing renewal activity. More than a quarter of all authorities (26 per cent) employed less than three staff. When staff employed indirectly were taken into consideration this made very little difference to the overall picture.
Hence, the most significant conclusions to be drawn from the study are that private sector housing renewal has a very low political priority locally and that many housing authorities in the country are not adequately staffed to carry out their obligations under the RRO and the Housing Act 2004.
The final provisions of the overall agenda, including the Housing, Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) and the mandatory and discretionary licensing powers relating to houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), have only very recently been introduced by the Housing Act 2004 and have not yet come into effect. As a consequence, this research is very much a snapshot of the early stages of the introduction of a new regime for private sector housing renewal, which constitutes a radical departure from previous approaches. Indeed, the most significant element of the new reforms, the introduction of loan finance, remains at a very tentative stage of development, although it has already had an important impact on policy.
The researchers suggest the following:
All of the above depend on more central government support and the attraction of much higher levels of financial and staff resources to the programme.
The research involved a number of different methodologies. These included: