Highlighting what older people in care homes want and need.
How can we ensure a 'better life' for older people in residential and nursing care homes when their voices are rarely heard?
This study examined the experiences and aspirations of these older people and highlights their ambition to increasingly influence decisions about care, support and wider issues such as:
More information about the Better Life programme is available here.
Finding out what determines 'a good life' for older people in care homes
This study examined the experiences and aspirations of older people living in residential and nursing care homes. It highlights their ambition to increasingly influence decisions about care, support and wider issues such as whether or not to move to a care home, what helps to enhance their quality of life, and what is needed to promote their inclusion in care home, family and wider community life.
By researchers at the National Development Team for Inclusion
Approximately half a million people live in care homes (the vast majority of whom are older people) but users are reputed to have little choice and control. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (within its Independent Living Programme) is looking at key areas in the social care system to see if barriers to 'person-centred' support can be challenged and overcome.
This study specifically sets out to describe good practice that exists or could be put into practice to build a positive and aspirational vision of 'a good life' for older people with high support needs living in care homes. At the same time it recognises the reality of most people’s lives, and the capacity of the care home sector to deliver this vision.
The research team met with over 200 people including 84 older people living in care homes, extra care housing and supported family placements – quotes in this paper are all from older people living in care homes. Researchers and older people worked side by side, which allowed very different conversations to be held covering a range of experiences and support needs, including dementias. Commissioners and providers of local services, user and carer organisations, policy makers, academics and others with an interest in this area were also consulted.
There are assumptions (after decades of research and practice knowledge) that professionals know what older people need if they require a lot of support in their daily lives.
However, in the course of this study it became clear that the voices of these older people are so quiet as to be practically absent from discussions about their requirements and importantly their preferences and priorities. Professionals, relatives, commissioners, policy makers and politicians are those who most often speak on behalf of older people, and it is their voices that dominate in these debates. The evidence from this study is that:
I wouldn't tell anyone if I was depressed – just get on with it – which happens quite a lot.
A range of situations, events and circumstances lead older people into care, including:
It is very common for decisions to be made quickly and for events to develop at high speed when options for intensive support are being discussed – especially at times of crisis. Points of no return are reached rapidly, for example properties are sold, making it impossible to provide support at home.
I came here eight years ago. My sight was deteriorating, bad arthritis, wasn’t coping – my social worker bullied me into coming here.
Many of the older people who took part in the research did not want to end up living in a care home. Their situation had most commonly come about as 'a last resort' because few options or alternatives exist, or because people didn’t find out about them before moving.
I didn't make a conscious decision – I think I would have said I'd go home if anyone asked. Mind you I had the stairs and the bedroom was upstairs.
A key finding when reviewing reasons for moving into care is that it is usually other people (families, GPs, social workers) who are in control of older people's decisions, arrangements and financial transactions at this critical period in their lives – and this situation does not change once people have moved into a care home.
Many older people in the study were trying to 'make the best of it' in their new circumstances and they shared their stories about what helps them to do this, and what prevents them from doing so. Only a small number of people said that the change had been positive.
This third-party decision-making on a major life change seems to be acceptable only for older people. There is no current equivalent of this fast-track path into a care home among other groups of people needing support. The world of alternative and creative support has moved ahead much further outside the sphere of older people's long-term care services than within it, and there are increasingly many more support options available to other groups.
A fall whilst in hospital led to my GP deciding I should not return to live alone in my house
I didn't know about the home… but my daughter had enquired in other homes but found this one more acceptable for me
It is clear from the study findings that older people with high support needs (in general) and the resident population of care homes (in particular) are regarded as and treated like commodities, not consumers with rights, entitlements or purchasing power. This became clear in discussions about money (what people are eligible to receive) and in the way that funding and market factors dominate discussions of long-term care (rather than a focus on older people's lives).
I had to sell my flat to pay for X care home so now I haven't got any choice – this is my home because it's all I've got left
An understanding of and focus on voice, choice and control – on self-determination and individual human requirements – is missing at all levels for older people with high support needs:
There is a clear lack (particularly by comparison to other users of social care services) of a strong and unifying vision of a good life for older people with high support needs. The language of services and needs dominates. There has been an emphasis on better management, a modernisation agenda and structural change. Sympathetic and personal language is rarely used to describe older people needing a lot of support. The evidence suggests a need to refocus on a 'rights-based' approach – in words and experiences that make sense to and reflect the lives of older people who need a lot of support.
I'm new to this game and haven't forgotten the other game yet. When you let go of a lot that went before – what can you put in its place?
Evidence from the care homes, from discussions with residents, staff and others involved, and wider discussions show that current assumptions about care home practice remain ageist and problematic. Incremental quality improvements are not moving practice towards older people's ideas of a better life.
The evidence shows that 'dignity and respect' are low aspirations on which to build a challenging agenda for government policy and best practice guidance on long-term care. Whilst dignity and respect are key ingredients, a completely different approach is required, based on citizenship and beginning with an increased focus on personal identity, self-expression and individual aspirations, rights and circumstances.
Also required is a much deeper understanding from older people's perspectives of what needs to be changed in order to have a good life, rather than just relying on professionals' and others' views about high- quality services.
It would be great if we could use some of the fee we pay for our own leisure, maybe have someone for two hours each week to do what we want with us – take me out on the bus, sort out my wardrobe.
I wish I had the same person so I could get them into my routine… you end up having to fit in with their routines. I pay a lot of money here… I think it should be my routine that's found out and stuck to.
The study findings point to the need for a more positive picture of what 'a good life' looks like, even when a person needs a lot of support.
The most commonly mentioned areas were:
The evidence from this study is that personal identity and self-esteem (referred to over and over again in conversations and observations of care home life) – is often underplayed or not recognised in services and support arrangements. For older people, this element needs to be at the heart of future care provision.
The study reviewed existing literature on the subject of the voice, choice and control of older people with high support needs. A research team, including older researchers, worked in four study sites (three areas in England and one in Scotland) and had discussions with older people (living in seven care homes, two extra care housing schemes and two adult/family placement schemes) and other local stakeholders (commissioners, providers, carers and third sector organisations). A number of discussion events were also held to explore initial findings from the research. A call for information and examples of best practice provided further evidence of different approaches and knowledge about 'what works' in this area.