How much do we know about older people's housing needs and the choices available to them?
Older people considering a move have similar needs to any other potential buyers – they want to ensure they choose a property which meets their present and future requirements. Is this possible in the current housing market?
Using original analysis of official data, interviews and a literature review, this study:
This study moves the debate on older people's housing away from simplistic notions about 'holding onto housing' to wider questions about choice and demand.
If an older person is thinking about moving, do they have a wide enough choice of housing? What is the impact on their well-being and quality of life? How far do such moves free up housing for families? This study seeks answers to these questions for England using original analysis of official data, interviews with key players and a focused literature review.
The study focuses on the 7.3 million older households in mainstream or specialist housing in England (excluding care homes) which contain no-one below the age of 55.
About 7 per cent of older households (530,000) live in specialist housing where a lease or tenancy restricts occupation to people aged over 55, 60 or 65. Most of these schemes are provided by housing associations and offer special facilities, design features and on-site staff. Around 10 per cent of specialist dwellings are in schemes offering care as well as support.
93 per cent of older people live in mainstream housing. As well as 'ordinary' housing, this includes housing considered especially suitable for older people due to dwelling type (e.g. bungalows), design features (including 'lifetime homes') or adaptations (e.g. stair lifts).
Our research confirmed that there is limited choice for older people who want to move to both specialist and alternative mainstream housing, in terms of tenure, location, size, affordability and type of care or support. Housing providers tend to focus on retirement villages and housing with care when thinking about housing that is 'suitable' for older people.
Despite the majority of older people owning their homes outright, 77 per cent of specialist housing is for rent and only 23 per cent for sale. There are significant regional variations: the extremes are the North East (only 10 per cent for sale) and the South East (37 per cent for sale).
There has been recent interest, but slow progress, in developing different housing options for older people and in integrating these within mainstream new housing developments (which could attract older people who prefer to remain in mixed-age communities). There is extensive evidence on what older people are looking for and whether they stay put or move. Two bedrooms is the minimum that most older people will consider, to have enough space for family visitors, a carer, storage, hobbies, or separate bedrooms for a couple. Analysis of moves by older households in the last five years within the private sector (rent or owner-occupier) shows that 87 per cent move into a dwelling with two or more bedrooms. Yet much specialist housing is small (one-bedroom or sheltered bedsits). Some specialist housing is poorly located and there have been concerns about withdrawal of scheme-based staff. Depending on the method of estimation used, the projected growth in the older population requires an increase in the stock of specialist housing of between 40 per cent (200,000) and 70 per cent (350,000) over the next 20 years.
Older people move home less often than younger people because many neither want nor need to move. Owner-occupiers are especially reluctant to move from freehold to leasehold housing such as a retirement property with potentially high service charges and exit fees on re-sale.
Many older people prefer to remain living in mixed-age housing and communities. Staying put (perhaps with adaptations) can be the right choice, offering advantages such as keeping pets and continuing emotional and practical support (from neighbours, local organisations, etc.). However there is also evidence that moving (especially to housing with care) can improve quality of life, physical health and social well-being.
The current climate is challenging and market conditions remain difficult for developers. There is little public money for new social rented housing. Interview respondents agreed on factors limiting the choice of mainstream and specialist housing for older people:
The government defines under-occupation in relation to the 'bedroom standard'. This allows one bedroom for every couple and one for every single adult (aged 21 or over) in a household. Other rules determine the bedrooms required for children and adults aged under 21. A household with more than one bedroom above the standard is deemed to 'under-occupy'. The measure takes no account of room or dwelling size, whether couples sleep apart because of choice or disability, nor how 'spare' bedrooms are used. Any single person or couple living in one of the 63 per cent of dwellings with three or more bedrooms is therefore under-occupying.
Table 1 (see PDF) presents statistics on under-occupation:
Around 200,000 older person households move each year (3 per cent of all older person households) and around three-quarters of these moves are within the same tenure. Measured by the tenure of the new dwelling, owner-occupation accounts for 56 per cent, private rented for 14 per cent and social rented for 30 per cent.
Older households who have moved recently are less likely to under-occupy than those that have not moved. In the social rented sector, under-occupation among recent older movers is close to nil.
But 50 per cent of older owner-occupied and 26 per cent of older private rented sector households under-occupy after moving. These proportions are about one-third lower than comparable older households who have not moved.
Among other households (containing at least one person under 55) who move into three (or more) bedroom properties, 58 per cent of owner-occupiers and 34 per cent of private rented tenants under-occupy after moving. When older under-occupiers move, around half of the properties they vacate continue to be under-occupied by other households.
The current discussion of downsizing is misleading because it presents the issue as a simple matter of older people holding onto housing. This ignores both the lack of housing choice, as well as older people’s psychological and social reasons for staying put. If the government believes that more older people should move to smaller homes, it must make choice its watchword, finding ways to induce providers to offer a range of attractive alternatives.